Quality in the Clouds

Today, information zips back and forth between companies like lightning from a summer shower.  It’s not clear if these are real communications or simply electrical discharges in a silent sky.  A recent article in Scientific America reported the discovery of a small “Trojan” planet that shadows earth’s orbit.  This discovery didn’t take any special astronomy.  The information lay hidden within databases for years before anyone ever “discovered” it.

Knowledge about this sister planet may not be very useful.  However, if we can hide something like that in our databases, what else is there that could have serious impacts on our organizations.

Perhaps our data just sinks into a database like the one that held the secret of our sister planet.  It’s a murky problem.  The evolution of databases may shed some light on it.

Originally, companies developed massive databases to warehouse information.  Storage costs were low. Not knowing what might be important, designers developed systems to collect information on everything:  the useless with the good.  Redundancy reigned.  They placed no thought in how they would access the information.  Consequently, data extraction and analysis became a specialty.  Data “mining” became an appropriate metaphor.  Data diamonds hid in the digital dirt.

To address these problems, companies started breaking up their databases.  They made them specialized.  One database provides shipping and delivery information.  Another provides corrective and preventive action reports.  Still others provide order-entry information, sales, or customer service information.  The era of specialized modules in ERP systems arose.

These modules made it easier access to information.  But, it also created problems.  Suppliers had to input data into multiple systems.  Customer service entered data into one system.  The shipping department entered it into another.  The quality department accessed a third.  Even maintenance had to get involved.  They updated customer programs with preventive and predictive maintenance data.

Some customers take their data-hunger to an extreme.  This makes it necessary for daily and sometimes hourly updates by the supplier.  The automotive industry leads the use of these data hogs.  But they aren’t the only industry.  According to Al Freeland of The QC Group, Inc., he is familiar with a large electronics company that requires job progress, inventory, run yields, traceability and shipping information uploaded on a constant basis.  Suppliers face more tethers to this customer than to their own internal tracking systems.  With such oversight, who’s left to mind the store?

Again, we’ve created a new job:  Making sure that everyone in a supply organization keeps each different department for each customer properly informed.    Failure in just one database risks loss of the entire business.

The question remains, do all these transferred electrons really improve business.  The answer is a resounding: “It depends!”

Just-in-time (JIT) business frequently requires more information than the traditional batch-and-queue.  However, successful JIT organizations use pull systems.  Centralized ERP systems devolve into long-term planning tools.  Kanban cards and one-piece-flow handles the day-to-day and hour-to-hour requirements.

However, when your customer is a JIT business, and you are not, you place your customer in a very precarious position.  Literally, the loss of a horseshoe can lose not only the battle, but also the entire war.

Cloud computing opens up two exciting possibilities.  Mutually accessible data is probably its biggest advantage.  Instead of a push data system, the cloud offers true two-way communications.  Secondly, the cloud provides the opportunity to redesign the data systems.  We can use this to help remove the tethers binding all the different suppliers to the customer’s data systems.

These two possibilities arise from using an open-structured database.  With a common language, it is easier to develop interfaces to share data.  For example, automatic upload and download interfaces can populate forms and tables, avoiding the need to log into a customer’s internet system.

One service company uses cloud computing to run their business from cell phones and IPad.  Pictures and on-line checklists record the progress of field technicians for the home office through the cloud.  Customers also access this information to know the status of their projects.  Both companies can capture the data they need through simple interfaces that link the cloud to their internal systems.

In many cases, the users interface with the cloud to download only the relevant data using an appropriate queries or customized reports.  Sale people access the most current prices; customers access delivery information.

Think of these cloud networks as a data wikis.  They won’t provide you messages or meeting notices, but they will populate your programs with important information.  They’re there, when you need them, in real time.

Who knows, you may never again have to leave your network:  no lost communications, no lost data, no delayed “discoveries”, and no secret planets.

Richard Heller

Dick Heller, a trainer/consultant for The QC Group, has his MBA, CMQ/OE, CQE, CQA and CSSGB.  In addition, he earned his Black Belt from Allied-Signal (now Honeywell).  Mr. Heller provides ASQ Certificate training, as well as both Lean and Six Sigma systems coaching.  He has also implemented numerous ISO 9001 and TS 16949 applications.  His most recent innovation, the Action Management© program, integrates executive team management, project management, ISO 9001, process mapping, lean and six sigma into a unified business management system.  You can reach him through The QC Group.

Published in: on September 13, 2011 at 10:50 am  Leave a Comment  

GD&T – How Much Should Your Inspector Know?

Knowledge of the proper use of Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) is a must-have for any dimensional inspector that may encounter the use of GD&T symbols.  But how much does an inspector really need to know?

 Two of the most commonly used geometric symbols are profiles and true position.  Yet the application of profile and true position are of the most complex of the GD&T methods.  Therefore, a mechanical inspector must have a firm grasp of the application of GD&T – both in the product design as well as how to verify the finished part in the lab.

 A GD&T fundamentals course will be effective for most entry-level to intermediate dimensional inspection positions.  But for those who consult with design engineers or customers regarding GD&T print definitions, a study of advanced concepts is appropriate.

 The QC Group tests inspector and engineering applicants to establish their level of understanding in blueprint reading and geometric dimensioning and tolerancing.  This step assures that the person is properly fit to that part of the assignment – eliminating the guess-work for the client.

Published in: on June 8, 2010 at 1:18 pm  Leave a Comment  

Top 10 Quality Seminars Shift Gears

A significant shift in quality training seminars has taken place in 2010 from basic dimensional inspection training to automotive-related quality disciplines.  The QC Group’s offering of more than 70 course titles in over 50 cities nationwide is receiving a very different response in popularity compared to 2009.  “Our 2010 on-site classes have all been ‘automotive’ related: APQP, Design FMEA, and Process FMEA” notes Jann Henkes, Training Coordinator at the QC Group.  “Last year we saw a lot of cross training and re-training in quality basics due to companies downsizing.  It appears that now, with high profile automotive recalls, companies are investing in process quality training, auditing, and advanced quality planning much more than we’ve seen in nearly 2 years.”

The QC Group’s top 10 quality training classes attended this year are:

  1. ISO 9001:2008 Certified Lead Auditor
  2. Gage Calibration Methods
  3. Auditing to ISO 17025
  4. ISO 14001 EMS Certified Lead Auditor
  5. Measurement Uncertainty Budgets
  6. Statistical Process Control (SPC training)
  7. GD&T Training– Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
  8. OHSAS 18001 Lead Auditor
  9. Blueprint Reading for Industry
  10. 10.  ISO 9001:2008 Certified Lead Auditor for the Automotive Sector (TS 16949)
Published in: on March 10, 2010 at 12:20 pm  Leave a Comment  

Top 10 Quality Seminars Growing

The QC Group offering of seminars continues to grow in public recognition and popularity.  So far in 2009, seminars have been held in 12 states as a result of the broad interest in quality-related training.  Jann Henkes, Training Coordinator at the QC Group, acknowledges that, “early on we saw a lot of cross training and re-training due to companies downsizing, but now there’s interest across a broad-base of industries as companies gear up for the future.” 

The QC Group’s top 10 most-attended seminars in 2009 are:
    1. Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
    2. Basic SPC
    3. Gage Calibration Methods
    4. Quality 101
    5. Basic Dimensional Measurement Tools
    6. Blueprint Reading
    7. OHSAS 18001 Lead Auditor
    8. ISO 9001:2008 Certified Lead Auditor
    9. ISO 9001:2008 Certified Internal Auditor
 10. CMM Programmer Training

Jann adds, “Part of the interest in our growth is our money-back guarantee, which only has had to be refunded once in the last 3 years.”  I suppose the fact that all of QC’s instructors are required to have hands-on real-world experience in the subject matter contributes to the success rate as well.

Published in: on September 14, 2009 at 4:18 pm  Leave a Comment  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.